Book Review: The Springer Handbook of Spacetime

David Garfinkle

David Garfinkle is Professor of Physics at Oakland University. His research is in numerical relativity: the use of computer simulations to study the properties of strong gravitational fields.

Review of “The Springer Handbook of Spacetime” edited by Abhay Ashtekar and Vesselin Petkov

The word “Handbook” in the title is something of a misnomer: it is perhaps better to think of this book as a collection of mini review articles on various topics in relativity.  The best way to use the book is to think of a topic in relativity about which you would say “I wish I knew and understood more about X, but I don’t have the time to read a review article about X, nor the expertise to understand a typical review article on the subject.”  Then look in the book to see if there is a chapter on X, and if so, read it.  (Then repeat the process for each X).  Each mini review article comprises a chapter and the chapters are organized in sections that reflect a particular aspect of relativity.

The first two sections, Introduction to Spacetime Structure and Foundational Issues concentrate mostly on the basic properties of spacetime and on philosophical issues connected with special and general relativity.  I found these sections Continue reading

Taking Newton into space

The test mass retroreflector

Schematic of M R Feldman et al‘s  proposed experiment. The test mass retroreflector, exhibiting harmonic motion within the tunnel of the larger layered sphere, is represented by the filled black circle on the left. Determinations of the round trip light-time from the host spacecraft (on the right) using an onboard ranging system provide measurements of the period of the oscillator.

Newton’s gravitational constant, G, is crucial for fundamental physics: it governs how much spacetime curves for a given mass, is essential for metrology, and might give clues to a deeper understanding of quantum gravity. However, G continues to present unexpected issues in need of resolution. Determinations over the last thirty years have yielded inconsistencies between experiments significantly greater than their reported individual uncertainties, oddly with possible periodic behavior. To push forward, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has recently called for new “high-risk/high-impact” proposals to produce a step-change improvement in measurements (NSF 16-520).

In response, we propose taking advantage of the classic gravity train mechanism by Continue reading

Insight: Some one loop gravitational interactions in string theory

Anirban Basu

Anirban Basu is a researcher at Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad
India

String theory yields ultraviolet finite scattering amplitudes in theories of gravity coupled to matter. While the matter content of the theory is dependent on the compactification, the presence of gravity in the spectrum is universal. Hence, this is drastically different from the high energy behavior of conventional quantum field theories of point like excitations because such amplitudes are generically ultraviolet divergent. While in quantum field theory the ultraviolet divergences arise from short distance effects which manifest themselves as divergences arising from high momentum modes in loop integrals in various Feynman diagrams, these divergences are absent in string theory where analogous loop integrals involve an integration over the fundamental domain of the moduli space of two dimensional Riemann surfaces which is the Euclidean worldsheet of the string propagating in the background spacetime. The fundamental domain precisely excludes the regions of moduli space which yield the ultraviolet divergences in quantum field theory. The ultraviolet finiteness of string theory makes it, among other reasons, particularly attractive in the quest for a theory of quantum gravity. On the other hand, there are infrared divergences that arise from the boundaries of moduli space in calculating string amplitudes which reproduce expectations from quantum field theory, which must be the case as string theory must reproduce field theory at large distances. Hence, their cancellation proceeds as in field theory.

However, calculating these loop amplitudes in perturbative string theory is not an entirely trivial exercise. In the absence of Ramond–Ramond backgrounds, tree level amplitudes have been calculated in superstring theory. The one loop amplitudes, which are more complicated, have also been Continue reading

Do black holes really have no hair?

Tim Johannsen

Tim Johannsen is a postdoctoral fellow at Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics and the University of Waterloo specializing in black-hole astrophysics and tests of general relativity.

Black holes have no hair – so they say. Formally, this statement refers to several famous theorems in general relativity that were established mostly from the late 1960s to the early 1970s and are collectively known as the no-hair theorem. According to this theorem, a black hole only depends on its mass, angular momentum (or spin), and electric charge and is uniquely described by the Kerr-Newman metric. So, just about everyone would expect that astrophysical black holes are indeed the Kerr black holes of general relativity understanding that any net electric charge would quickly Continue reading

Book Review: The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time

JulianBarbour

Julian Barbour is an independent theoretical physicist and Visiting Professor in Physics at the University of Oxford. He has specalized in the relational aspects of dynamics.

Review of “The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time” by Roberto Mangabeira Unger and Lee Smolin

The Singular Universe is effectively two separate books held together by some common ideas. Roberto Mangabeira Unger is a philosopher, social and legal theorist and politician who helped to bring about democracy in Brazil and has twice been appointed as its Minister of Strategic Affairs (in 2007 and 2015). According to Wikipedia (current entry), “his work begins from the premise that no natural social, political or economic arrangements underlie individual or social activity.” A similar spirit informs his approach to cosmology. Lee Smolin is of course well known as one of the creators of loop quantum gravity and as the author of several popular-science books. For brevity, I shall refer to the authors as RMU and LS. The book is over 500 pages in length. The first part, by RMU, is more than twice the length of LS’s and could have been shortened without loss of essential content. There is a final 20-page section detailing differences of view, which are substantial in some cases because RMU advocates a much greater break with the conventional approach to science than LS.

The two authors are agreed that a new ‘historical’ approach to cosmology is needed. For RMU, the mere fact that the universe has been shown to have a history is enough to indicate that the methods hitherto used to study the universe must be radically modified. LS argues for a new approach because of our failures to understand the history and properties of the universe as so far discovered. He points out that, Continue reading